GMAT Test Prep Teach Yourself the GMAT CAT in 24 Hours
    GMAT Home   >  Test Yourself—Verbal Ability   >  Reading Comprehension
 
T E S T    Y O U R S E L F 
GMAT Reading Comprehension
10 Practice Questions  
Review Directions (opens new window)

 
Questions 1-3 are based on the following passage:

    In nearly all human populations a majority of individuals can taste the artificially synthesized chemical phenylthiocarbonide (PTC). However, the percentage varies dramatically—from as low as 60 percent in India to as high as 95 percent in Africa. That this polymorphism is observed in non-human primates as well indicates a long evolutionary history which, although obviously not acting on PTC, might reflect evolutionary selection for taste discrimination of other, more significant bitter substances, such as certain toxic plants.
    A somewhat more puzzling human polymorphism is the genetic variability in earwax, or cerumen, which is observed in two varieties. Among European populations 90 percent of individuals have a sticky yellow variety rather than a dry, gray one, whereas in northern China these numbers are approximately the reverse. Perhaps like PTC variability, cerumen variability is an incidental expression of something more adaptively significant. Indeed, the observed relationship between cerumen and odorous bodily secretions, to which non-human primates and, to a lesser extent humans, pay attention suggests that during the course of human evolution genes affecting body secretions, including cerumen, came under selective influence.

 
 
Question 2

Which of the following provides the most reasonable explanation for the assertion in the first paragraph that evolutionary history "obviously" did not act on PTC?
 
(A)  PTC is not a naturally occurring chemical but rather has been produced only recently by scientists.
(B)  Most humans lack sufficient taste sensitivity to discriminate between PTC and bitter chemicals occurring naturally.
(C)  Variability among humans respecting PTC discrimination, like variability respecting earwax, cannot be explained in terms of evolutionary adaptivity.
(D)  The sense of taste in humans is not as discriminating as that in non-human primates.
(E)  Unlike non-human primates, humans can discriminate intellectually between toxic and non-toxic bitter substances.

Answer/Analysis  |  Go to NEXT Question >